In the political arena there has been much discussion of Gay marriage lately, as President Obama has changed his position in support of Gay marriage. I do not want this blog to be political, but the issue of Gay marriage comes up from time to time. It is an issue that exposes what peoples real values are. It also tends to make Christians make up their mind about what’s important for our society. I believe that the Bible is the revealed word of God to all mankind. The morality from the Bible about sex being within marriage between a man and a woman is a moral absolute that applies to all people. It is not something that becomes out of date because it is not man who defines marriage. God’s word has the authority to define absolutes for all people to live by. There may be various legal definitions of marriage. They can be either right or wrong because God sets the moral standard and laws should be based on the moral standard. The laws should be based on the Biblical moral standard because that is healthier for society and for individuals by God’s design. You could also look at it in a pragmatic way related to child rearing and argue that it is a good means of raising children, totally apart from what people believe about the Bible. Most religions in the world have a similar concept of marriage to what the Bible teaches, with some exceptions. So you could argue that traditional marriage is a cross-cultural global societal norm and be correct for most people in the world. Thus, traditional marriage should not be abandoned or devalued. In an evolutionary atheistic world view, marriage would be something that was merely invented for practical convenience sake in raising children. If marriage is something man invented, then why wouldn’t it be something man could reinvent to be something different? This is a logical question. There has been resistance to God’s definition of marriage and the morality that goes with it all through history.
Human beings have always tried to come up with some kind of substitute for God’s standard of marriage. People tend to attempt to lower the moral standard to make it seem easier for them to live by. But the substitutes for marriage all have problems. God’s design is best. Multiple wives was perhaps the first variation (polygamy). This was allowed by God in ancient times but was not really recommended. Genesis shows some of the complications and conflict that can arise from the practice. A more modern substitute for marriage is living together, where two people do not have to make a life-long commitment to each other. Gay marriage is another kind of substitute for God’s standard. American society used to frown on people living together but not any more. Divorce has become so common that some have proposed that marriage be changed into a contract that is only in effect for a limited number of years. One man wrote a book arguing that in about 50 years robotics technology would advance enough that people would be marrying robots. There are still religious groups that practice polygamy, mostly Muslims in certain Arab nations. The practice is illegal in the United States, even though there are occassionally Mormon or religious cult groups that engage in the practice. I fear that in coming years we will see a variety of efforts to redefine marriage. Gay marriage may only be the first of these movements. Christians have to stand up for the truth of traditional marriage and for what is healthy for society in times like these. Man’s efforts to invent substitutes for marriage have a way of exposing over time the wisdom of God’s design, though most people do not recognize this. Unfortunately some people’s lives end up going through much pain before they turn around and find the right way. I wonder what the prevailing opinion in society will be toward Gay marriage, say 40 years from today? What will children who grew up in Gay households think of it when they are adults? Society values tend to swing back and forth over generations sometimes. Perhaps values can swing back to the right, in time.
There are many who think of the opposition to Gay marriage as discrimination and they present the issue as a civil rights issue. But this is a fallacy because a moral argument against homosexuality is not related to discrimination. God determines right and wrong, not human beings. If the laws approve of something which God does not approve of, the legal status (and social acceptance) does not take away from adverse consequences of the immoral lifestyle. God is completely nondiscriminatory in applying the standards of morality. This is true whether people “believe” it or not. All people have reason to acknowledge right and wrong about sex and marriage from their own experience. If I make a moral argument against homosexuality, that is not about discrimination. It is saying that a kind of argument exists that the homosexuals deny. They do not accept a moral argument because they don’t accept biblical morality. They do not accept a moral absolute that applies to all people the same way. So they don’t agree with me, but that does not give them a basis for saying that I am encouraging discrimination. Discrimination is something different than a moral argument against homosexuality. When I was 20 or 30 years younger, the gays had a legitimate issue over discrimination in the work place. But that was different than the present situation in our society and it is not the same as what they are trying to accomplish about marriage. Gays want states, and the nation, to redefine marriage just for them. I say this is wrong because gays do not have the right to redefine marriage. In fact, it seems to me it is odd for gays to want something similar to traditional marriage but allowing for their lifestyle. With so many giving up on marriage anyway, why are they trying to have something similar to the traditional institution? In a way they are trying to be traditional, but in a manner that is not allowed by biblical morality. I believe God’s design for marriage is healthier for society and for individuals.